Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/04/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing legacy Nikon lenses to Leica R lenses on the Sony A7II 70-200 range
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:41:25 -0500
References: <422975765.7051.1523487588125@wamui-charming.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <E242279D-B48E-4E1F-85B7-F37387401A16@rabinergroup.com> <DDEEBF15-6629-4957-B4FC-8B54EE860D54@gmail.com>

The 60 Macro-Elmarit-R fits that description quite well, also.? I use it 
quite often on my X-T2.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 4/13/2018 1:27 PM, Philippe via LUG wrote:
> Pity I sold my F mount macro-elmarit - I think I would have sent its deep 
> small pupil over to you Mark
>
> Amities
> Philippe
>
>> Le 13 avr. 2018 ? 20:02, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> a ?crit :
>>
>> I still use my 3.5 Micro Nikkor I got used in 2004 but spent an hour ago 
>> looking at the still sold new 2.8 micro Nikkor which is  a tad more 
>> compatible with some of the current camera technologies and can be had 
>> relatively cheap. And it's gorgeous. I love a lens which has a small 
>> front element so well protected inside the camera a lens shade would just 
>> be redundant. I balk at loving a lens for its lack of modern perfection 
>> and am very much into the current cutting edge examples of lens design. 
>> But sometimes what the older generations of lenses can do is quite viable 
>> on most levels.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photographer
>>
>> ?On 4/11/18, 6:59 PM, "LUG on behalf of Doug Herr via LUG" 
>> <lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of lug at 
>> leica-users.org> wrote:
>>
>>     Frank Filippone wrote:
>>
>>> Legacy lenses are fascinating to use on the Sony bodies.
>>>
>>     Yes they certainly are!  Until a couple of months ago legacy lenses 
>> were all I was using on the Sony body.  My favs:
>>
>>     Nikon 55mm f/3.5 Micro AI: inexpensive, relatively light weight, 
>> quite good performance.  I haven't tested it against the Leica R 60 Macro 
>> but the light weight and low worry in case of loss or damage make it my 
>> casual carry-everywhere lens.
>>
>>     Canon FD 500mm f/4.5 L: Inexpensive and relatively light weight for a 
>> high-quality long lens.  It requires some correction for lateral 
>> chromatic aberration but C1 does this automatically.  Its highlight 
>> separation and color quality aren't as good as a Leica APO lens but most 
>> of the time its good enough, especially considering its affordability.
>>
>>     Leica 280mm f/4 APO-Telyt-R: for no-compromise mind-boggling image 
>> quality.
>>
>>     Doug Herr
>>     Birdman of Sacramento
>>     http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>     http://doug-herr.fineartamerica.com
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Leica Users Group.
>>     See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



Replies: Reply from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] Comparing legacy Nikon lenses to Leica R lenses on the Sony A7II 70-200 range)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Comparing legacy Nikon lenses to Leica R lenses on the Sony A7II 70-200 range)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Comparing legacy Nikon lenses to Leica R lenses on the Sony A7II 70-200 range)
Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] Comparing legacy Nikon lenses to Leica R lenses on the Sony A7II 70-200 range)