Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2018/05/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Need printing paper advice
From: abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 21:19:42 -0600
References: <c2c74dab-7671-5d0d-c068-e15efca63e3c@gmail.com> <CABXy404kkiFWipMrD6m6JvscMWb3g3eKHvvqFgMt+06ORAfQ2g@mail.gmail.com> <D973A593-D4CA-49F6-9839-D67F2891FCE5@mac.com> <81e488f8-03fb-0318-3f3b-9d90150c2ec7@iol.ie> <CAH1UNJ3p0dwij3NH6OiyrRc_fRgMrZzPUR5dPgQnih8r16VBSA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+yJO1AdK=gf_huRaQVUCgdU_OkSVyMXQ-8_7P9dcL_MvWpG8w@mail.gmail.com>
So I?m guessing that Tina will need an essay submitted by the model that
indicates she meets some (high) standard for posing for a photographer. But
models that pose for art schools are okay? Or are they being taken advantage
of also?
How does this work, Tina, that you can decide if a woman is being taken
advantage of and that the photographer with the camera, or the artist with
pencil or paint brush, is somehow making porn? Really?
I just don?t see how this works and who could possibly meet your standard.
i?m disappointed.
Adam
> On 2018 May 6, at 8:23 PM, Tina Manley via LUG <lug at leica-users.org>
> wrote:
>
> I will avert my eyes but I will not appreciate it and I will be offended if
> photos take advantage of young women who hope to become famous because they
> are posing for male photographers with expensive cameras.
In reply to:
Message from boulanger.croissant at gmail.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] "Monkey selfie" copyright case settled)
Message from ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] "Monkey selfie" copyright case settled)
Message from rclompus at mac.com (Richard Clompus) ([Leica] Need printing paper advice)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Need printing paper advice)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Need printing paper advice)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Need printing paper advice)