Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/02/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree in this case that they are over-processed. I guess catching the eye of the judges is similar to trying to sell stock, though!! I prefer more natural for myself and in the National Geographic! Tina On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:53 AM Howard L Ritter Jr <hlritter at bex.net> wrote: > Eyebrows raised by the degree of post-processing in many of the images? I > agree, but as Tina pointed out, that kind of image seems to be what > ?sells?. I?d have hoped the editors of NatGeo would have had different > standards? > > ?howard > > > On Feb 21, 2019, at 8:51 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> > > wrote: > > > > > https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/photography/national-geographic-travel-photography-nature-cities-people-a8789841.html > > > > Quite surprised that the 'Marrakesh' portfolio was chosen.... > > > > john > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Tina Manley www.tinamanley.com tina-manley.artistwebsites.com http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley <http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html>