Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600
From: Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:31:29 -0500
References: <20030122145753.GA6119@panix.com> <5.1.1.6.0.20030122104236.009f36a0@pop-server.twcny.rr.com> <20030122164458.GC6119@panix.com> <3E2F87DD.5010908@webshuttle.ch> <008f01c2c33c$59729210$0200a8c0@c439786a> <OE34TjKVS2vUtqbPCRO000181bf@hotmail.com> <3E30CCBC.2090406@webshuttle.ch> <p05210203ba56f7dd9e51@[68.99.226.126]>
i concur with steve though my speed is 1/3 stop slower, at 800.
- -rei
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 07:03:37AM -0700, Steve Barbour wrote:
> I have been told to shoot it at 1000 or 1200 and develop
> normally...any experience with this approach? Steve
- --
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> ([Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Ernest Nitka <enitka@twcny.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> ([Leica] Re: Noepan 1600 (WAS: niagra falls))
Message from "Phil Leeson" <pjleeson@mchsi.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)
Message from "faneuil" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)
Message from Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)