Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 20:02:44 -0800
References: <200401022159.i02LxHb21510@perch.serverhost.net> <013001c3d17d$e83dfe80$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <014e01c3d180$fc6cbe70$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <i5fdvvob9un4h2hpc90af3graqcqtk2bqj@4ax.com> <1073348454.5853.98.camel@creo_pc3> <015a01c3d403$6c3c2fe0$7d38030a@sroffice>

Seth Rosner offered:
Subject: Re: [Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL


> The SL may be bulky and lack bells and whistles. For me, it remains to
this
> day the best SLR made.<<<

Hi Seth,
As you know I usually work three SLR's or 3 M's on assignments or
combination of the 6 of them at the same time. So the camera load with the
SL was more than enough to wear me out on many a day. Certainly with the
motors which I think it was 10-12? AA batteries to drive the motor. So three
of them hanging off neck and shoulders with a couple of m's and you've got a
Leica load! :-)

I used 3 Leicaflex SLMOT's, for those who don't understand "mot" it's the
motor driven version and I swear the SL and motors were made from
regurgitated WW 2 Tiger Tanks!!! :-) As solid as a brick sh..t house! Man
they could take a beating like no other camera I've used in the slr types.

When the SL2 came out it wasn't the robust hammer the hell out of it same
camera. I believe it was the beginning of the electronic bits and pieces so
they were a tad frail, bump one and the meter would go haywire. The SL? You
could hammer nails building an arctic bivouac and it would still work. :-)

I still have the first one I purchased 1968-69? Don't use it, as it's just a
keep sake! See at heart I'm really just a sentimental old fart at times. ;-)
:-)

I get it out of an old camera case with a couple other notables from shoots
gone by, run all the shutter speeds a half dozen times while recalling happy
assignment memories using it and tenderly return it to bed till another
shutter run. ;-)

One very beautifully made camera.

ted




- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Kit McChesney" <kitmc@acmefoto.com> (RE: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> ([Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL)
Message from Seth Rosner <sethrosner@direcway.com> (Re: [Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL)