Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/01/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL
From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 21:26:01 -0700
References: <200401022159.i02LxHb21510@perch.serverhost.net> <013001c3d17d$e83dfe80$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <014e01c3d180$fc6cbe70$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <i5fdvvob9un4h2hpc90af3graqcqtk2bqj@4ax.com> <1073348454.5853.98.camel@creo_pc3> <015a01c3d403$6c3c2fe0$7d38030a@sroffice>
Seth Rosner wrote in part:
>Sherry K tells me the SL is the only SLR camera whose quality and
>construction makes it the equal of the M3, in her opinion the best RF ever.
>
>I think Doug Herr shares this opinion.
>
>
>And I believe only first expressed his opinion **after** actually using the equipment for some time. A refreshing change from all the Digilux 2 speculation on the List lately.
>
Regards,
Greg
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from "Kit McChesney" <kitmc@acmefoto.com> (RE: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> ([Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL)
Message from Seth Rosner <sethrosner@direcway.com> (Re: [Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL)