Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] should be Tmax 3200 at 1600/was TriX at 800
From: Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com>
Date: 26 Jan 2004 17:34:31 -0800
References: <001001c3e45d$e7302750$b2710e44@newukolbqveo9i> <p06020400bc3b59ad13d9@[68.106.255.242]> <p06020400bc3b60b9ba8d@[68.106.255.242]>
 
I prefer Delta3200 @ 1600 or 3200 in Ilford DD-X. In my opinion it has
less contrast, with better highlight and shadow detail. Tmax3200 has too
much contrast for my taste.

I have read that the true speed of TMX3200 is about 800-900asa, Delta
3200 is 1200asa and Neopan1600 is really about 640asa.

Feli


On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 16:28, Steve Barbour wrote:
> whoops... Tmax 3200 !
> 
> >on a related issue...for shooting... in available darkness,  how 
> >about Tmax 3200 shot at 1600 and processed normal...I have been told 
> >this works great...  very fast, with good results... anybody 
> >know?.....good way to get you to 1600 ?...Steve


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] should be Tmax 3200 at 1600/was TriX at 800)
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] should be Tmax 3200 at 1600/was TriX at 800)
 In reply to: Message from "Jeffery Smith" <jls@runbox.com> (RE: [Leica] TriX at 800)
Message from Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> (RE: [Leica] TriX 3200 at 1600/was TriX at 800)
Message from Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> ([Leica] should be Tmax 3200 at 1600/was TriX at 800)