Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Feli, That used to be my preferred combination until I tried Fuji Neopan 1600. I have always shot both films at 1600, and I get much better tones, better shadow details, better grain with the Fuji film. I have developed it in both XTOL and DD-X, and also by a lab which uses Fuji Neopan developer. In all cases, I have found Neopan to be the best of the three high speed films. Nathan Feli di Giorgio wrote: > > I prefer Delta3200 @ 1600 or 3200 in Ilford DD-X. In my opinion it has > less contrast, with better highlight and shadow detail. Tmax3200 has too > much contrast for my taste. > > I have read that the true speed of TMX3200 is about 800-900asa, Delta > 3200 is 1200asa and Neopan1600 is really about 640asa. > > Feli > > On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 16:28, Steve Barbour wrote: > > whoops... Tmax 3200 ! > > > > >on a related issue...for shooting... in available darkness, how > > >about Tmax 3200 shot at 1600 and processed normal...I have been told > > >this works great... very fast, with good results... anybody > > >know?.....good way to get you to 1600 ?...Steve > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl Mobile: +31 630 868 671 Photo site: http://www.wajsmanphoto.com/index.htm - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html