Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm not sure what your point is here, BD. Or maybe I'm not sure what it means. Suppose Leica doesn't sell another film camera and everyone only buys a DMR/R9 or an M8. If the company can keep up with demand, and if the demand is equal to its film cameras, then they have a winner as a company. Of course I don't think this is what will happen. Film camera sales will shrink as digital takes hold. Because it appears that the M8 is a real winner - making images better than film can produce at high speeds (over 800) - with excellent work-flow for both color and B&W operation. I think the loss of film could be a blessing to Leica. Not, of course to those who want to shoot film but, as you point out, there will be some real deals on film cameras. Adam On 10/25/06, B. D. Colen <bd@bdcolenphoto.com> wrote: > The issue isn't just how many M8 bodies Leica will sell - and I'm going to > guess 2500-3000 the first year, and less in the second - but rather what > the > release of the M8 will do to film camera sales. As we know, Leica is barely > afloat; the R8-9 has been a loss leader for some time, and the M6 and M7 > were steady, if modest, sellers. But with the introduction of the M8, one > has to wonder if the sales of new M7s will dwindle to next to nothing, > because people are unloading their film Ms at bargain prices to purchase > M8s, making used cameras much more inviting than new ones. So it's unlikely > the M8 will really add to the Leica bottom line, as, 10 years ago, an > entry-level M film body might have, but rather will drain film sales. Of > course it may turn out that the company will succeed in developing a new, > digital, business model which will revive it and keep it going. It's going > to be interesting to watch.