Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
From: tomschofield at comcast.net (Tom Schofield)
Date: Mon Nov 5 07:51:37 2007
References: <C353DCF4.739E3%mark@rabinergroup.com> <519DD479-52C0-4301-9E8E-931B283E296F@comcast.net> <p0623090ac3547167b5d5@[10.1.16.153]>
That's UWATE, Henning! I'm on a crusade. 28mm is till wide & 16mm
is Ultra-Wide!
Tom
On Nov 4, 2007, at 11:11 PM, Henning Wulff wrote:
> Sorry; I just looked at the WATE distortion curves again;
Replies:
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)