Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
From: tomschofield at comcast.net (Tom Schofield)
Date: Mon Nov 5 07:48:34 2007
References: <000301c81ec6$9453b1d0$6401a8c0@asus930> <C3534798.7381C%mark@rabinergroup.com> <3e7573d40711040703q2f4b2cfdmaddcf72c15f23d6a@mail.gmail.com> <3DF4C0F7-0AA2-45F5-B7CF-B865FDE63F5F@comcast.net> <112DA8D9-4D6A-4372-93C0-13394ABA44A1@mindspring.com>

I hope I don't run afoul of any NDA, but you can look for a pink  
paint edition of the Tri-Tele-Elmar next October, for National Breast  
Cancer Awareness Month.

(Ric -- Its just one of those things that hit me -- I agonized longer  
over whether it would be too politically incorrect to write!)

Tom


On Nov 4, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Ric Carter wrote:

> too funny!
>
> how long did you have to work on that?
>
> ;^)
>
> ric
>
>
> On Nov 4, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Tom Schofield wrote:
>
>> When they finally make the 75-90-135 Tri-Tele-Elmar I have been  
>> advocating for years, we can call that one the TITEE.  Maybe they  
>> will sell them in matched sets. ;-)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from tomschofield at comcast.net (Tom Schofield) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)