Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
From: ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Mon Nov 5 07:59:49 2007
References: <000301c81ec6$9453b1d0$6401a8c0@asus930> <C3534798.7381C%mark@rabinergroup.com> <3e7573d40711040703q2f4b2cfdmaddcf72c15f23d6a@mail.gmail.com> <3DF4C0F7-0AA2-45F5-B7CF-B865FDE63F5F@comcast.net> <112DA8D9-4D6A-4372-93C0-13394ABA44A1@mindspring.com> <58B0D9D4-57E0-4B40-8DA0-9B2FA0B40FCC@comcast.net>
feel free to share any of those doubtful comments off list
i'll try not to be too sensitive;^)
ric
On Nov 5, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Tom Schofield wrote:
> I agonized longer over whether it would be too politically
> incorrect to write
In reply to:
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from tomschofield at comcast.net (Tom Schofield) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from tomschofield at comcast.net (Tom Schofield) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)