Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not really, Jerry. I mentioned the Moskva-5 and the Zeiss Ikon it was a knock-off of: http://www.cosmonet.org/camera/mosc_e.htm Daniel On Feb 2, 2008 7:26 PM, Jerry Lehrer <glehrer@san.rr.com> wrote: > Jim und Daneel, > > You have forgotten the /ne plus ultra/ folder of all time; the Super > Ikonta B. > > Jerry > > > > jim Nichols wrote: > > Daniel, > > > > Coupled RF's have been around for years on folders. The old 4x5 Speed > > Graphics had coupled Kalart RFs that connected to the focusing bed by > > a folding arm. As I recall, the Retina series of 35mm folders were > > also coupled. > > > > Jim Nichols > > Tullahoma, TN USA > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com> > > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > > Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 2:30 AM > > Subject: Re: [Leica] It's a film camera! Rangefinder at that! > > > > > >> On Feb 2, 2008 8:55 AM, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > >> > >>> The linkage to the front, which looks to be relatively flimsy, I > >>> assumed was just for retraction as on the folders I have here. > >> > >> Yes, it does look flimsy and that is what suggests, for me, that it is > >> a rangefinder part rather than a part that is intended to lock and > >> stabilize the extended lens. > >> > >> I'm > >>> struggling to imagine how the coupled rangefinder you mention works. > >>> Do you have a model number I can search on for one of the > >>> originals? > >> > >> I think you can go after the Makina Plaubels. They'd probably be the > >> easiest to find descriptions of. > >> > >> You can't see it unless you know what you are looking at: > >> > >> http://www.rus-camera.com/camera.php?page=other&camera=iskra > >> > >> But on the Iskra, with the camera in your hands ready to use, at the > >> bottom left is an arm that goes back to the rangefinder. But you can't > >> really see all of it, just a part that sticks out, because it goes > >> under the bellows instead of over. > >> > >> I hope they don't waste money on developing "A" exposure for this. A > >> reliable shutter and aperture is enough. > >> > >> Daniel > >> > >> > >>> Regarding the metering, look at the dial on top nearest the > >>> viewfinder. It looks to have provision for ISO rating and also an A > >>> setting? A leaf shutter, as you say, ruins my TTL theory. Any non > >>> TTL metering implies a linkage, fascinating. > >>> Off this topic, I note Fuji's choice in very Nordic Booth babes in > >>> the article! Oh and no less than three new DSLRs from Sony. > >>> Cheers > >>> Geoff > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org > >>> [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On > >>> Behalf Of > >>> > >>> Daniel Ridings > >>> Sent: Saturday, 2 February 2008 17:30 > >>> To: Leica Users Group > >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] It's a film camera! Rangefinder at that! > >>> > >>> On Feb 2, 2008 8:22 AM, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > >>> > Richard, I hadn't looked closely enough. It is a rangefinder! I > >>> see no > >>> > possible way this could be linked to the (tabbed) focus ring with > >>> a > folding bellows in between. > >>> > >>> You see that stabilizing arm extending from the body out to the lens > >>> head? It might be able to slide in and out, thus pushing a > >>> rangefinder mechanism here and there. > >>> > >>> > The old originals of course were just focussed by guess applied to > >>> the > >>> > focus ring distance scale manually. > >>> > >>> No, the Agfa's (later a Commie Iskra model), Zeiss-Ikon's and others > >>> had coupled rangefinders. > >>> > >>> > >>> > For exposure control I would guess that the lens is set exactly as > >>> per > >>> > an M, then the shutter speed is adjusted via the dial on top > >>> (complete > with A setting). An Auto setting implies that the metering > >>> is TTL! > >>> > >>> Who needs an exposure meter on one of these? I doubt seriously that > >>> it can be TTL. That would be assuming it has a focal plane > >>> shutter and it obviously has a leaf shutter. They open and close > >>> when you take the shot, so they are not letting any light through > >>> until then. It would be over-kill to have TTL with such a mechanism. > >>> > >>> Daniel > >>> > >>> > >>> _ > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >