[Leica] Erwin and the S2; comparison

[hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)]

Nathan was just being mischievous to provoke responses. Vous aussi mon
ami???

Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman

NO ARCHIVE


On 23 December 2010 01:42, <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote:

> All technies do that, whatever the "science" ,
> bringing complexity is part of forming a self-justified community which
> goes as far as inventing their own language as a proof of their existence,
> and meaning-tight acronyms for the layman to stay out; think of our RAW, 
> SM,
> LTM, LEI, CA, etc
> ;-)
>
>
> Ph who works with mathematicians, lawyers, chemists, linguists, economists,
> etc.
>
>
>
>
> Message du : 22/12/2010
> De : "Spencer Cheng " <spencer at aotera.org>
> A : "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Copie ? :
> Sujet : Re: [Leica] Erwin and the S2; comparison
>
>
>
> Actually, I try to make things as simple as reasonable. Making things
> complex is far easier. :)
>
> After all, it is just a bunch of bits at the end of the day. The art of
> computer programming is making sure the right bits are in the right order 
> at
> the right time with minimal amount of effort.
>
> Regards,
> Spencer
>
> On Dec 22, 2010, at 2:34, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
> > It's because techies have an inherent interest in making things as
> complex as possible. Makes it more fun, and makes it less likely that mere
> mortals will see through the hoax.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> NO ARCHIVE
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>