Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/04/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:51:35 -0500
References: <687547.86382.qm@web82108.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <9DC793B4-A06C-44D1-A4AB-3B5B5A11F4CF@mac.com> <379073.13570.qm@web82107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <459A015C-99CB-4626-A0FE-56548E3E019B@mac.com> <497754.70664.qm@web82105.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <ABF2ADC2-6A42-4543-AAE6-A426D854A48C@mac.com> <9A240596-3295-4B82-98CB-EBAC0D43B905@yahoo.com>
On Apr 18, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Bob Adler wrote:
> Got that. Light!
> http://acratech.net/product.php?productid=69&cat=1&page=1
that will not give you a "level pan"
because the panning element is below the leveling element.
Again - it's a matter of the degree of precision you require.
Some folks on this list are doing wonderful pans handheld.
Yet if you're looking for view camera precision
you need to level the panning element.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
In reply to:
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)