Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DMR V D3s
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 22:04:47 +0530
References: <C9D603D2.D950%mark@rabinergroup.com> <FF13011F-7EDC-4542-9F24-91F96ED86ED7@mac.com> <95c61925526faff8ca7d97145c5fb3d9.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com> <46E94A99-08D7-491D-BA9D-2CB157117375@gmail.com> <042e01cc00f2$182fc050$488f40f0$@earthlink.net> <20573337-2C8F-47BF-A383-13AD46423287@gmail.com>

Luis,
You are a lucky fellow, you will never get Equipment Acquisition Syndrome.
The Nikon D3s is the current low light, high ISO champ amongst cameras. The
photograph you commented on was taken by Alastair at ISO12800:

Details: http://www.nikon.com.sg/productitem.php?pid=1348-c75670a50e

Review: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond3s/page33.asp

Cheers
Jayanand

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Lluis Ripoll
<lluisripollquerol at gmail.com>wrote:

> Frank,
>
> I'm not currently up to day with other brands, I don't know which kind of
> camera is a DS3...., which other images with DS3 are here?, I'm not very
> qualified with digital knowledgements but I'll share my opinion with
> pleasure.
>
> cheers
> Lluis
>
>
> El 22/04/2011, a las 15:35, Frank Filippone escribi?:
>
>  Luis.. the D3S image is a 1.6MP JPEG taken under circumstances that we
>> have
>> no data on.  What lens?  Tripod?  What JPEG settings?  What camera
>> settings?
>>
>> When viewed at 1:1 on my monitor, I see no signs of noise....  It looks
>> pretty good to me.  In fact, I see no signs of noise or JPEG artifacting.
>>
>> What do you see in THIS image that is not what you think it should be?
>>
>> Is it possible that your opinion of the D3s came from other images?
>>
>> I am trying to learn about noise..... and what people define as noise and
>> object to...
>>
>> Alistair... I am very interested in your D3s v DMR results....   Using the
>> same conditions, only the camera body being the variable.
>>
>> Frank Filippone
>> Red735i at earthlink.net
>>
>>
>> IMO the noise it is no too much noticeable and is a nice picture
>>
>> cheers
>> Lluis
>>
>>
>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/3nr9zwq
>>>
>>> Cheers and here's luck
>>>
>>> Alastair
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] DMR for sale....)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] DMR for sale....)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)