Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DMR V D3s
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 22:49:53 +0200
References: <C9D603D2.D950%mark@rabinergroup.com> <FF13011F-7EDC-4542-9F24-91F96ED86ED7@mac.com> <95c61925526faff8ca7d97145c5fb3d9.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com> <46E94A99-08D7-491D-BA9D-2CB157117375@gmail.com> <042e01cc00f2$182fc050$488f40f0$@earthlink.net> <20573337-2C8F-47BF-A383-13AD46423287@gmail.com> <BANLkTimeo=K2wYxxLje47rrXaktwt4ox+A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Jayanand,

Thank you, you are right, I'm not absolutely dependend of the last new  
thing on the market, all my life I wanted have some things and once  
I've get it I've never had the syndrome you mention. Thanks for your  
explained details.

cheers
Lluis

El 22/04/2011, a las 18:34, Jayanand Govindaraj escribi?:

> Luis,
> You are a lucky fellow, you will never get Equipment Acquisition  
> Syndrome.
> The Nikon D3s is the current low light, high ISO champ amongst  
> cameras. The
> photograph you commented on was taken by Alastair at ISO12800:
>
> Details: http://www.nikon.com.sg/productitem.php?pid=1348-c75670a50e
>
> Review: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond3s/page33.asp
>
> Cheers
> Jayanand
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Lluis Ripoll
> <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Frank,
>>
>> I'm not currently up to day with other brands, I don't know which  
>> kind of
>> camera is a DS3...., which other images with DS3 are here?, I'm not  
>> very
>> qualified with digital knowledgements but I'll share my opinion with
>> pleasure.
>>
>> cheers
>> Lluis
>>
>>
>> El 22/04/2011, a las 15:35, Frank Filippone escribi?:
>>
>> Luis.. the D3S image is a 1.6MP JPEG taken under circumstances that  
>> we
>>> have
>>> no data on.  What lens?  Tripod?  What JPEG settings?  What camera
>>> settings?
>>>
>>> When viewed at 1:1 on my monitor, I see no signs of noise....  It  
>>> looks
>>> pretty good to me.  In fact, I see no signs of noise or JPEG  
>>> artifacting.
>>>
>>> What do you see in THIS image that is not what you think it should  
>>> be?
>>>
>>> Is it possible that your opinion of the D3s came from other images?
>>>
>>> I am trying to learn about noise..... and what people define as  
>>> noise and
>>> object to...
>>>
>>> Alistair... I am very interested in your D3s v DMR results....    
>>> Using the
>>> same conditions, only the camera body being the variable.
>>>
>>> Frank Filippone
>>> Red735i at earthlink.net
>>>
>>>
>>> IMO the noise it is no too much noticeable and is a nice picture
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> Lluis
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/3nr9zwq
>>>>
>>>> Cheers and here's luck
>>>>
>>>> Alastair
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] DMR for sale....)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] DMR for sale....)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)