Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think a lot of it has to do with a kind of brand loyalty or perceived quality, not by the shooter but by the customer. The Pentax LX was a better camera than the Nikon F3. More advanced in every way with lenses that were at the very least every bit as good as Nikon or Canon but here we are 21 years after the discontinuance of the LX and Pentax is just a shadow of its former self. We get into this gear vs gear talk all the time and what matters in the end is the negative or print or scan or whatnot. Final output. Cause no one can tell what you used if you did your job right with the camera. (don't be bringing up Holga vs Hasselblad either) Phil Forrest On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 15:05:50 -0800 Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote: > Chris, this is why I always buy used cars. I pay less than a new car > and never bitch about the various Toyota we own. > > But seriously, why is Pentax 645D a lesser cameras? All I hear is > "Leica S2 or Hasselblad is better because they are more expensive." > > How about the Pentax has water sealing? (so does the S2...) > > How about the Pentax handles pretty nicely? > > How about the Pentax has 40 MP? > > How about someone no less than Salgado shot years with a 645? > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Chris Crawford > <chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com > > wrote: > > > In 2006, my grandmother bought a new car. She had a 1987 Ford > > Escort that she had bought new. She has money but is tightfisted, > > so when she bought the Escort, she went to the local Ford dealer > > and said she wanted the cheapest new car on the lot. Then she paid > > cash for it. > > > > She hated that Escort the entire time she had it. It was a little > > tin-can shitbox that rode rough, had no engine power, was > > claustrophobically small inside, and God help you if you get in a > > wreck with someone driving a big car! She bitched about that Escort > > the whole time she had it, and when she replaced it in 2006, she > > swore she was going to buy a nicer car. > > > > She didn't want to spend too much though. She looked at the Ford > > Focus, the successor to the Escort and a better built car, though > > still a crappy econo-tincan, and she looked at a Taurus, a nice > > midsize car. The Taurus was $3000 more than the Focus. That was > > just $3000 too much and the old cheapskate bought the Focus, once > > again paying the full cost of the brand-new car in cash. > > > > My grandma has done nothing but BITCH incessantly to everyone who > > will listen about what a piece of shit her car is, and how much she > > hates it because its too small, rides rough, has no power, and she > > feels unsafe in it. Sound familiar? Yeah, same complaints she had > > about her last new car, the 87 Escort. > > > > Seriously, if you're already spending $10+ thousand, a couple > > thousand more for a better camera is worth it. > > > > > > Lesson: Spend the money and get the right camera. > > > > -- > > Chris Crawford > > Fine Art Photography > > Fort Wayne, Indiana > > 260-437-8990 > > > > http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio > > > > http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! > > > > http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798 > > Become a fan on Facebook > > > > > > > > On 3/4/12 4:28 PM, "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com> > > wrote: > > > > >That way of thinking leads to madness! > > > > > >$13K for H4D-31, but hey > > >$13K for a P40+, and "only" $5K more to get an Alpa and a good > > >lens! But hey, > > >$18K, may as well pay another $4K for the S2 body and what's > > >another $4K for a lens? > > > > > >But wait... $26K? You can get a P65+ and another $5K for an Alpa > > >with a good lens! > > >$31K? Chump change. Now you can get a S2P setup! > > > > > >Or wait, $31K + $8K gets you the ULTIMATE IQ180. Who doesn't want > > >THAT? Another $15K gets you the ultimate ultimate Alpa with 3 lens > > >setup. > > > > > >So now we are looking at $52K. > > > > > >All because $13K is just $2K more than $11K. > > > > > >AND NOT a single photo has been taken. > > > > > > > > >On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:10 PM, <grduprey at mchsi.com> wrote: > > > > > >> If I was going to spend $11K on a digital MF camera I would spend > > >>another > > >> $2k and get the Hasselblad H4D-31. > > >> > > >> Gene > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > >> From: "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com> > > >> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > > >> Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2012 11:26:29 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada > > >> Central Subject: Re: [Leica] S2 vs. 645D > > >> > > >> The genesis of the camera seems to be that Pentax finally > > >> finished it so that it can make the company more appealing to > > >> Hoya, but then it got > > >>wildly > > >> popular (well, wildly is a relative term in medium format > > >> world). Now another owner later, they are certainly taking their > > >> time releasing new lens. There is one wide lens already: 25mm > > >> which is even wider than the > > >>new > > >> Leica S2 35mm but one will have to make do with the older 645 or > > >> 6x7 > > >>lens > > >> in the mean time. The performance varies so you may have to try > > >> several lens to get one that performs well, but they are dirt > > >> cheap though, relatively speaking. > > >> > > >> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:12 PM, John McMaster > > >> <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz > > >> >wrote: > > >> > > >> > Pentax don't seem to be rushing out new/wider lenses for it, > > >> > not sure (either way) of the quality of the lenses from the > > >> > film days. > > >> > > > >> > john > > >> > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > If I can finagled $11K, I'd buy the Pentax 645D in a > > >> > heartbeat. \ > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > >> > Leica Users Group. > > >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > > >> > information > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Leica Users Group. > > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > > >> information > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Leica Users Group. > > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > > >> information > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > >// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Leica Users Group. > > >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > > >information > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > -- philforrest.wordpress.com gallery.leica-users.org/v/philforrest