Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search] Sent: Thursday, 31 May 2012 10:04 a.m.
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Endgadget on the MM
Where did you hear that? There can be some issue with exposure readings
but nothing wrong with focus...
Was what I said (NZ time of course ;-))
john
________________________________________
On May 30, 2012, at 7:05 PM, John McMaster wrote:
> That was in my first reply, there are other ways of meter reading but
> (with correct exposure) there would be no difference in Nikon or Canon
> bodies...
I don't follow this John , I'm sorry,
there is a simply a very real difference in the results of our picture
taking....
I have done this myself,
Steve
>
> john
> ________________________________________
>
>
> On May 30, 2012, at 7:00 PM, John McMaster wrote:
>
>> I guess the difference is adaptors (wobbly) or Leitax, with the latter
>> (and only way to fit to Nikon) I would expect no difference in
>> Canon/Nikon.
>
>
> but there is a difference... in the linearity of exposure compensation.
>
> Steve
>
>>
>> john
>> ________________________________________
>>
>>>
>>> Where did you hear that? There can be some issue with exposure readings
>>> but nothing wrong with focus...
>>>
>>
>> At least on the high-end bodies... on the affordable bodies mirror box
>> alignment is one of those things that's cut out to make the desired price
>> point.
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
------------------------------------------------------------
Mail was checked for spam by the Freeware Edition of CleanMail.
The Freeware Edition is free for personal and non-commercial use.
You can remove this notice by purchasing a full license!