Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]There is an aspect of this debate which has not been addressed. Namely, of all the corrections available in, say Lightroom, just what limitations exist on what Lightroom can do to alter a camera-produced jpeg compared to what LR can do to the RAW from the same image. Herbert Kanner kanner at acm.org 650-326-8204 Question authority and the authorities will question you? On Jun 5, 2013, at 6:40 AM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote: > What are you willing to die for? > "the concept of only photographing in RAW mode." > > I wonder if the RAW ARMY is also willing to kill for the idea? > > I only shoot RAW. Though if my life depended on delivering a .jpg out of a > camera - I'd deliver the .jpg. > > In reality: It's obviously very possible to develop software to: preserve > highlight and shadow detail; provide a deep, rich dmax; and provide any > other parameters one desires. > > The only reasons to drag a RAW FILE through a RAW processor: 1) to see if > an other than "normal" rendering may be preferred; a delightful and > potentially creative process to be sure; and one I have always enjoyed. 2) > to "save" an under or over exposed, or poorly lit file. > > a note off the iPad, George > > On Jun 5, 2013, at 5:02 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > >> A kind who would >> never shoot a jpeg if his life depended on it. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information