Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/09/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My memory is it was a 75mm lens they started with which they promised would be the last Leica lens they'd make they had no intention of competing with Leica. Then they came out with a body. Then a wide. Though I'm really a capitalist and am all for competition and feel positive about most of the output of the Cosina company and its alternate lower price point and have and use some of their stuff, glass and bodies In both my Leica M, LTM and also my Nikon DSLR systems. Also some of the Cosina stuff shows some imagination that Leica didn't have. Compact slower optics as Leica was coming out with metal munching high speed monsters with a price tag which reads like a house down payment. Though in many cases glass wise I'd rather go with an older Leica from a previous decade as resolution and contrast is not such a big thing for me all the time with digital. I like the idea more of glass being the best it can be in 1960 more than glass made in 2013 dumbed down to fit the money pocketbooks of the consuming masses. And I like Nickel and brass more than I like aluminum and plastic. On 9/11/13 5:52 PM, "Jefffery Smith" <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote: > My recollection is that Cosina ultrawides piqued interest in people who > couldn't justify paying for a Leica ultrawide. I'm not sure I can justify > paying for a Cosina ultrawide; I just don't use them any more. I do > remember > when digital was sort of a verboten subject on the LUG. These days, > digital is > the norm on the LUG. > > I'm glad that this group is still hanging in there, even if they don't > always > use Leica. I quit the Pentax forum because (1) it often didn't involve > Pentax, > and (2) it often didn't even involve photography. That's a bad combination. > > Jeffery > > -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/