Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Haah! I actually thought they were from the S2 and hence a very exclusive sub-set even rarer than the M (Typ 240). However I very carefully put you in the 'not specified' column lest I be accused of bias. I did put Jayanand's in the Nikon column and Ric's in the Leica column though. The 'not specified' column is interesting. I wonder how many just want to make a statement that the equipment doesn't matter and how many just take it as read that we shoot with Leica ;-) Two startling developments that I noticed were that Lluis submitted one in Colour and so were both of Ted's! ;-) ;-) Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 11 January 2014 09:02, John Nebel <john.nebel at csdco.com> wrote: > Geoff, > > Hope you counted mine as Leica. > > John > > > On 1/10/2014 3:50 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: > >> Since this has come up, I just took a head count on the photographs in the >> current yearbook for those interested. >> The largest group of photos were made with Leica cameras or (branded) >> lenses. That is the requirement by the way for the much larger Leica L >> Camera Forum which is exclusively Leica focused. >> I count 110 Leica photos. The M9 predominates. 13 with the Monochrom and 7 >> with the M (Typ 240). >> Nikon, Fujifilm, Canon and others combined 70 >> Not specified 59. >> >> So maybe the Fujifilm folks are gaining on us. Keep posting. Be warned >> that >> you still get counted in the Leica bucket if you put Leica glass on the >> front ;-) ;-) >>> >>> >>>>