Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1995/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: Leica List <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Subject: Re: 35 vs. 50 summicrons
From: Eric Welch <ewelch@gp.magick.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 10:19:33 PST

** Reply to note from msmall@roanoke.infi.net 12/11/95 08:28am -0500
> Later redesigns have been to reduce manufacturing costs and not to 
> improve performance, and current production lenses simply are not as 
> generally satisfactory as those made 25 years ago.

Your opinion is not in concert with many, including BAS labs in Germany  
which is a highly repsected test lab. The latest 35 Summicron is  
supposed to be the best they've ever made. But then Leica did slip for  
a while and not necessarily make the best they ever did, but there's no  
arguing that now they are producing the best they ever have. And from  
several friends who've used several versions of the 35 Summicron, the  
last is definitely the best. (I have the next to last.)

i.e. 100 Apo Macro, 280 Apo Telty, 180 Apo Summicron, 70-180 2.8 Apo  
Zoom, 35 Summioux Aspheric II.


Regards,

Eric Welch
Grants Pass, OR


Replies: Reply from "joe b." <joe@azurite.demon.co.uk> (Re: 35 vs. 50 summicrons)