Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]LUGs, I agree with Chuck. My T-max 3200 looked awfully thin, but printed very nicely. It was exposed at 1000 and developed normally by a local lab. I did the printing. Initially, I wanted to develop the film myself in HC110, but decided to do only one new thing at a time. This was the correct decision. Chris At 07:09 PM 2/2/97 -0800, you wrote: >Dan--- > Try printing what you've already developed before you start playing with >development times. I've found that any of the TMax films give you a >thinner-looking neg than you'll get from a traditional b&w film, and you >really need to print them and see what sort of print you get. > >Chuck Albertson >Seattle, Wash. > >At 10:46 AM 2/2/97 -0500, you wrote: >> >>Actually I have tried it on a few rolls but I haven't had a chance to print >>them yet. Can you suggest some starting points for development times? My >>negs seemed a little on the thin side when I followed Kodak's recomendations. >> >>Dan C. > > >