Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: L versus M
From: firkin@netconnect.com.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 97 07:38:43 -0700

I have used Minoltas for nearly 30 years. The images made with my first 500
instamatic Minolta were a revalation compared with Mr Kodak's Instamatic
50. I moved through Minolta rangefinders to the SRT 101 XD 7 [11] X700 and
a bevy of lenes. One year in Hobart a visiting Leica man suggested I borrow
a set of lenses and an R4. I tried every combination I could and brought
the 100 or so prints/slides etc back to the shop and said. "you sort them
into 2 piles". About 80-90% were correctly identified as Leica versus the
Minolta. I had thought it was true, but the poor shop owner was blinded to
the test so I felt even more convinced.

It took me many years and the experience of the CLE to finally get me into
Leicas, but the "pull" is strong ;-) Not sure if I could tell the
difference of the top of the line Nikon Canon or Contax lenses, but I'll
keep testing.

Cheers

Alastair Firkin

New September Page now up with;
Images of North Queensland in the exhibition
A travel page dedicated to Tasmania

http://users.netconnect.com.au/~firkin/AGFhmpg.html