Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] offtopic:35mm slide/negative scanner
From: "Sander van Hulsenbeek" <vanhulsenbeek@wxs.nl>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 21:40:52 +0200

I have good results with the Polaroid 35 LE, which as far as I
understand is identical with the Microtek. The Polaroid has better density
than the Nikon, due to the 30 bit internal scanning. It is fast, like less
than a minute at full, i.e. 1950 dpi,
optical resolution. Then the quality is slightly less than Kodak PhotoCD at
18MB res.
Th software is good, but you should do the filters in Photoshop or the like
(all less good than Pohotshop, to be prejudiced). EZSCSI 4.01 is good to
have, and it regognizes the 35LE. 32 MB is on the low side, I am afraid, for
comfortable scanning.
When you buy one: enjoy!
Alex, Amsterdam, Holland

- -----Original Message-----
From: Ferdinand U. LuDo <fld@mozcom.com>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 1998 5:20 PM
Subject: [Leica] offtopic:35mm slide/negative scanner


>Hello Luggers,
>
>I'd like to get into scanning my negatives and slides so that I can preview
>my shots before having them printed by my lab. I'd like to ask some
>opinions on the ff. 35mm slide/print film scanner:
>
>a.) Microtek Scan Maker 35T Plus for PC
>b.) Polaroid Sprintscan 35 LE PC
>c.) Nikon Coolscan LS-20  Coolscan II
>d.) Minolta Dimage Scan Dual
>
>I'm really new at this stuff and don't know much about it. Sure, someday
>I'd like to print out my outputs/results on a piece of paper, but for now
>my priority is to see the negative/results before having them printed by a
>lab. Before, I had a lab do me a contact print before having them printed.
>But the turn around time was too long (a few days). I'm now thinking of
>previewing it right into my computer screen. My equipment currently is a
>Cyrix 133+ with 1.2 meg hardrive, 32 Meg EDO ram and 2 Meg Video card
>(Diamond Stealth I believe). i know, its a bit outdated, but I'd like to
>know whether any of the above scanners listed above would work and what are
>the necessary hardware/softwares I need to get started.
>
>Would appareciate some advise,
>
>Ferdinand
>