Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: M6HM vs M6J , the complete (?) story !
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 15:25:16 -0400

At 02:47 PM 21-05-98 -0300, you wrote:
>At 21 May 1998 12:47:11 -0400, Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> wrote:
>
>> The HM is a great photo making tool, a great camera.  Who cares if another
>> model 'looks the way an M should'?  On what stone is it written how an M
>> camera should look?
>
>On the stone of my personal preference with respect to what I'd like to be 
>handling, of course.  I didn't bother to preface every one of my phrases
with 
>`in my opinion,' because what I was saying is obviously my opinion.
Needless 
>words.  See Strunk & White.
>
> -Jeff Moore <jbm@instinet.com>
>
Of course, there is an implied IMHO in my post as well  ;)

Dan C.