Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Leica] Amateur vs. Pro
From: Walter S Delesandri <walt@jove.acs.unt.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 17:19:09 -0600 (CST)

Yeah, what he said! :)
Walt

On Thu, 26 Nov 1998, Greg Locke wrote:

> At 04:05 PM 26/11/98 -0600, you wrote:
> 
> >Just because some one does not make their living with photography does
> >not  make  them  less  of  a  photographer.  Heck  those of you who do
> >photography  for  fun probably get more enjoyment from it that many of
> >us who do it for a living.
> >
> 
>         I can guarantee it.  I shoot thousands of rolls of film a year on
> commercial and photojournalism work. Most of the commercial stuff I couldn't
> care less about but my job is to make the client happy (and pay the mortgage
> and car payments) so I have to use all my tricks do give him something to
> make him OHHHH and AHHHH. (no jokes about prostitution, either! :^D )
> 
>         Out of a year of commercial shooting I would be lucky to have a
> couple of dozen "keepers" for myself.  It's a business. I provide a service
> to other people. 
> 
> Then there is the documentary and photojournalism work which I consider my
> personal work that I am lucky enough to get paid to do. This is my reward
> for doing the commercial stuff.
> 
> Emotional detachment from your pictures and objective editing is a big part
> of being a professional.  You have to think about the clients needs or the
> viewers needs and, sometimes, put them ahead of your own.
> 
> An amateur (or art photographer :O) will often "love" a picture or have an
> emotional attachment to it because of the memories associated with it. The
> pictures means something to them. The attachment is based on the
> photographers personal feelings at the time they took the photo. This, of
> course, may not be evident to someone else viewing the picture....and it
> doesn't matter because the photographer is happy with his picture.
> 
> A pro doesn't have that luxury. A pro's job is to make pictures that
> communicate ideas and messages that the viewer or client can "read" or
> understand.
> 
> Think of it as the External Consumption Engine!(where did that come from?)
> 
> This brings us to the concept of "Visual Literacy"..... which we'll leave
> for another day.
> 
> I don't even take my camera on vacation anymore. 
> My wife is the "family photographer." (shamefully, a Nikon girl)
> I can't handle the responsibility.
> 
> ...back to work,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Greg Locke <locke@straylight.ca>                               
> St. John's, Newfoundland.        
> <http://www.straylight.ca/locke/>
> ----------------------------------
> "I've finally figured out what's wrong with photography. 
> It's a one-eyed man looking through a little 'ole. 
> Now, how much reality can there be in that?" -- David Hockney 
>