Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Another question on 70-180 and 80-200
From: inyoung@jps.net
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 22:20:00

Hello,

 How about the 105-280 zoom lens?  I do not remember reading any post about
this zoom lens.  Has anyone had any experience with it?

Best Wishes,
David

At 10:58 AM 12/10/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Nigel:
>
>The 1.4 APO does not work on many Leica lenses.  It protruded in past the
>mount of the lens it is mated to so it will not work on any lens that has
>the rear element within a cm or so of the mount.  It will not work with the
>70-180, 180 APO's, or the 100 APO.
>
>I checked the Leica Adobe PDF file that I got from their site and it lits
>the compatible lenses as:
>
>180 F2 APO
>280 F4 APO
>280 F2.8 APO
>400 F2.8 APO and the rest of the Modular iterations
>105-280 F4.2
>The non-current lenses it will work with are:
>100 F4 Macro
>180 F2.8 non APO
>400,560, and 800mm Telyts
>
>
>I hope you don't mind me correcting you on it, as this was the third or
>fouth time you have suggested that people get a 1.4 APO extender.  I have
>one of these extenders and it does an excellent job with my 400 2.8 and my
>105-280.  It will not fit any of my other lenses except a Tamron 300 2.8 I
>have.
>
>Regards,
>
>Robert
>
>At 09:01 AM 12/10/98 EST, you wrote:
>>I can't comment on the optical comparison, but the Leica 80-200 is not
>>exactly tiny nor a featherweight, and it does not have a tripod mount. 
>>The f/4 speed means slower shutter speeds in dim light; this coupled with
>>the lens' length makes sharp images at the long end more difficult than
>>with the 180/4.  
>>What I might be inclined to do in your case (and this is assuming
>>compatibility, which as a non-user of Leica R I can't vouch for) is sell
>>the 135 and purchase a 1.4x multiplier.  In that way, you would have a
>>100/2.8, 140/4 *macro* (100 APO + 1.4x), 180/4, and a *small, light*
>>252/5.6 (180/4 + 1.4x) with the same close-focussing as the 180.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Nigel
>>
>>On Thu, 10 Dec 1998 18:52:39 +0800 Ben Ho ^_^ <longjohn@netvigator.com>
>>writes:
>>
>>>I can live without the extra 2.8 stop.  Does anyone know how is the
>>>optics of this 80-200/4 comparing to the old 135 and the 180 I have?
>>>(Thinking of selling off my 135 and 180.)
>>
>>___________________________________________________________________
>>You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
>>Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
>>or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>