Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leitz-Minolta CL
From: n.b.watson@juno.com (Nigel B Watson)
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 17:20:00 EST

It's not that the CL isn't a good camera, but it lacks the rangefinder
accuracy for the high-speed optics you'll eventually want for low-light
work.
I would suggest a cosmetically-worn but mechanically fit M2, M4-2 or M4-P
along with a similar-cosmetics black Leitz-Canada 50/2 from the late 60's
on.  The earlier chrome 50/2's are notorious for front coating damage and
the good ones...whose owners kept UV filters on them ; )...are priced
accordingly.  Those bodies except the M4-P lack 28mm framelines (as is
also the case with the CL) but if you consider the entire finder (beyond
the 35 framelines) it is basically what the 28 frames show in an M6. 
You'll need a separate meter (or an MR4, but I'd suggest a good, modern
digital handheld meter instead--cheaper and better) but it isn't that
much slower once you get the hang of it.

Regards,
Nigel

___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]