Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>... as am I. The eye is a much more sensitive instrument than any >light meter! This is a strange thing to say. Sure the eye is more sensitive than film, or most light meters. (I'm sure some scientific instrument that costs thousands is out there somewhere that is more sensitive). But knowledge of what light comes from certain subjects is useful to determine exposure. Such as when Ansel Adams remembered the exposure of the moon, and then went on to underexpose the foreground of "Moonrise Hernandez." But he normally relied on a meter. Why? Because as sensitive as the eye is, it's not calibrated. A meter will ALWAYS be more accurate than anybody's approximations. Brett Weston notwithstanding. He's the exception that proves the rule. Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch Pi R Squared? No Pi R round, Cornbread R Square!