Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Old Leicas and better than the new "Junk" Cameras
From: "Dan Post" <dwpost@email.msn.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 10:37:26 -0400

Doggone it, Guido!
Now I be 'jonesin'' for an M6, and I haven't even got a Summilux, yet!
Dan
- - Frustrated in Leicaland
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Guido Soprano <guidosoprano@hotmail.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 1999 1:14 AM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Old Leicas and better than the new "Junk" Cameras


> ABSOLUTELY,
>
> way to go Marc!
>
> GS
>
> PS, TomA does not have a metal organ.
>
>
> >From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
> >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> >Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Old Leicas and better than the new "Junk"
Cameras
> >Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 18:44:00 -0400
> >
> >At 05:27 PM 8/11/1999 -0500, Greg Chappell wrote:
> > >There ARE more products today made better than comparable products of
50
> > >years ago (cameras included), but just ask people like Sherry Krauter
at
> > >Golden Touch Camera Repair if that applies to M4's vs. the new M6's
being
> > >produced today, comparing part to part. You can probably reverse, to
some
> > >extent, what you said below. I own both an M6 and M4 and LOVE both, but
> >the
> > >M4 IS a better built camera.
> >
> >
> >For all of the many reasons pointed out by myself and others for so many
> >years, this Just Is Not True.  It is an urban myth.  The M6 is the best
> >built, best designed Leica RF camera ever.
> >
> >Marc
> >
> >msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
> >Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com