Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: R: [Leica] Which seperate meter?
From: "linda" <lindaboz@tin.it>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1999 21:28:37 +0200

Hello,
Deutscheoptik sell my Binoculars at 999$.
Selling them at Your proposed price is like to present them.
Regards,
Gian46
- -----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net>
A: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Data: sabato 4 settembre 1999 21.12
Oggetto: Re: [Leica] Which seperate meter?


>InfinityDT@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> In a message dated 9/4/99 2:19:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>> ewelch@ponyexpress.net writes:
>>
>> << At 09:25 AM 9/4/99 -0800, you wrote:
>>  >does any one have any preferences, not only in terms of brands, but
also
>>  >regarding analogue/digital meters.
>>
>>  The two names I put at the top are Minolta and Sekonic. You can't go
wrong
>>  with either one of those. And for what you need, I'd stay away from the
top
>>  of the line.
>>
>>  Eric Welch
>>  St. Joseph, MO >>
>>
>> I have the Sekonic L-408 Multi-meter (incident, 5-deg. spot--a nice
adjunct
>> to the Leica's not-so-narrow angle, ambi and flash).  Does it all, fairly
>><Snip>
>
>Why would someone leave "Gossen" out of this paragraph/equation? If they
didn't
>invent the meter they should have! Some people say Kleenex instead of
tissue; I
>say Gossen instead of meter.
>Mark Rabiner
>not really