Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - --Boundary_(ID_Wi0n8QjCBhtSojgkNZ0eRA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Nothings up with loading the TTL M6. Look at the sentence again, Bob. We're talking the M3 here! - -----Original Message----- From: Ruralmopics@aol.com [mailto:Ruralmopics@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 4:12 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: RE: [Leica] Next body -- M3/M6-.85? In a message dated 11/2/99 2:29:04 PM, Greg.Chappell@bankofamerica.com writes: >I'd go with an M3 simply because they are less expensive than a HM-M6, which is way too expensive being a low production item, or the TTL M6, & live with the film loading.> Whoa!!! What's up with the film loading on the TTL M6? Bob (waiter, there's a fly in my M6 soup) McEowen - --Boundary_(ID_Wi0n8QjCBhtSojgkNZ0eRA) Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2448.0"> <TITLE>RE: RE: [Leica] Next body -- M3/M6-.85?</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <P><FONT SIZE=2>Nothings up with loading the TTL M6. Look at the sentence again, Bob. We're talking the M3 here!</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Ruralmopics@aol.com [<A HREF="mailto:Ruralmopics@aol.com">mailto:Ruralmopics@aol.com</A>]</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 4:12 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: Re: RE: [Leica] Next body -- M3/M6-.85?</FONT> </P> <BR> <BR> <P><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 11/2/99 2:29:04 PM, Greg.Chappell@bankofamerica.com writes:</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>>I'd go with an M3 simply because they are less expensive than a</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>HM-M6, which is way too expensive being a low production item, or the TTL</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>M6, & live with the film loading.></FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>Whoa!!! What's up with the film loading on the TTL M6?</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>Bob (waiter, there's a fly in my M6 soup) McEowen</FONT> </P> </BODY> </HTML> - --Boundary_(ID_Wi0n8QjCBhtSojgkNZ0eRA)--