Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob, you really didn't get this? It is poor sentence construction, unless you made an un-emoticoned joke. It would better read: "I'd go with an M3 (and live with the film loading) simply because they are less expensive than either a HM-M6 (which is way too expensive being a low production item), or the TTL M6" Also, M60.85's are out there at normal M6 prices if you know where to go and where to avoid - -----Original Message----- From: Ruralmopics@aol.com [mailto:Ruralmopics@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 4:12 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: RE: [Leica] Next body -- M3/M6-.85? In a message dated 11/2/99 2:29:04 PM, Greg.Chappell@bankofamerica.com writes: >I'd go with an M3 simply because they are less expensive than a HM-M6, which is way too expensive being a low production item, or the TTL M6, & live with the film loading.> Whoa!!! What's up with the film loading on the TTL M6? Bob (waiter, there's a fly in my M6 soup) McEowen