Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 45/2.8 pancake
From: OzkerNs <ozker5@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 13:53:41 +0000

Mike Johnston wrote:
> 
> Mark Rabiner: >>>If I got the Contax I would go with the 45 2.8 Pancake.
> I'm even slow when it comes to groundglasses<<<
> 
> Mark,
> Nice lens (Tessar, similar in cross-section to the Leica Elmars, Nikkor
> GN, Pentax 40mm pancake, etc.), but the mount (barrel construction) is
> sub-par for Kyocera--old ones get loosey-goosey almost universally. If
> you get a new one, take care to be gentle and not to crank it hard. And,
> the lens is tough to focus on many of the new "bright" screens. I
> haven't tried it on an Aria, but, interestingly, the Aria has a "real"
> groundglass screen as opposed to a "bright" screen, for ease of focus
> with slower lenses. The Aria screen "snaps" nicely with the 35/2.8. I
> used the new 28-70 slow zoom on the Aria without focusing problems, but
> I found the 45/2.8 on an RX was almost impossible for me to focus.
> 
> Killer lenses in the Contax line include the 25/2.8, 85/1.4, and
> 35-70/3.4 zoom; the 85mm in particular is almost worth buying a body
> for. It's a really lovely lens.
> 
> --Mike
> 
> P.S. For those who will point out that this is a Leica list and I should
> be talking about Leica cameras, etc., I will: Aria + 85/1.4 = approx.
> $1,500; R8 + 80/1.4 = approx. $5,200, making the Aria/85mm combo a
> viable budget alternative for someobody looking for a portrait lens.


Okay, I'm visuallizing Cartman dancing around chanting "Aria, Aria,
Aria," and the other boys (facing bankruptcy with Leica bodies in hand,
shouting "shut up Cartman!"