Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]LUGnuts, I've contemplated this subject some and have a real problem even with the consideration. It comes down to this: each artist has unique vision, but a vision influenced by culture, experience, etc. There can be no "best." We are enriched by so many view points. To select one viewpoint is to miss the point of art for the viewer: to open our eyes and mind and heart. Maybe that is a little strong, but consider just whose vision you would allow as a censor to be the one, the best, the only, to the elimination of all the rest. Given my Taoist inclinations, the thought of singling out one photographer is like deciding what is the best herb and throwing away the rest. Ken Heyman's photos touch the simple human experience in me, Errnst Haas stirs the fires of wonder at the beauty of the world, Eugene Richards shows me worlds of suffering, Salgado demonstrates how we can have dignity no matter the circumstances of our lives, Kertez reminds me of the simple magic of life that surrounds us, Emil Schultheiss showed the glory of human accomplishments, and Werner Bischof showed us the elegance of everyday life, and Hiro the often unobserved beauty of everyday objects. Is there one writer of the century? One painter, filmmaker, reporter, musician? We live in context. We produce in context. We are all part of a continuum. We are blessed to have a medium that kindles our passions--both as observer and as artist. That is enough. Embrace the diversity. donal __________ Donal Philby San Diego www.donalphilby.com