Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well written comment -- Donal Philby wrote: > I've contemplated this subject some and have a real problem even with > the consideration. It comes down to this: each artist has unique > vision, but a vision influenced by culture, experience, etc. There can > be no "best." We are enriched by so many view points. To select one > viewpoint is to miss the point of art for the viewer: to open our eyes > and mind and heart. Maybe that is a little strong, but consider just > whose vision you would allow as a censor to be the one, the best, the > only, to the elimination of all the rest. Given my Taoist inclinations, > the thought of singling out one photographer is like deciding what is > the best herb and throwing away the rest. > > Ken Heyman's photos touch the simple human experience in me, Errnst Haas > stirs the fires of wonder at the beauty of the world, Eugene Richards > shows me worlds of suffering, Salgado demonstrates how we can have > dignity no matter the circumstances of our lives, Kertez reminds me of > the simple magic of life that surrounds us, Emil Schultheiss showed the > glory of human accomplishments, and Werner Bischof showed us the > elegance of everyday life, and Hiro the often unobserved beauty of > everyday objects. > > Is there one writer of the century? One painter, filmmaker, reporter, > musician? We live in context. We produce in context. We are all part > of a continuum. > > We are blessed to have a medium that kindles our passions--both as > observer and as artist. That is enough. Embrace the diversity. > > donal > __________ > Donal Philby > San Diego > www.donalphilby.com