Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Friends, In the past few days, there have been a number of comments about how Hanns-Peter Cohn is handling things at Leica. Well, I feel they are all off base. I have met the man and have had several lenthly conversations with him. I feel he is the right man for Leica and he is leading the company in the right direction. He is smart, perceptive and understands the needs of his customers. Leica is a small company with limited resources, they can not respond as quickly as we would like. He must prioritize (sp?). Give the guy a chance. He has the support of all the employees. To the R8 detractors out there. Did you know the R8 has out sold every other Leica reflex camera? If you don't like the size and feel of the R8, well there is the R6.2. FYI, Leica has looked very hard at Auto-Focus. They found an AF Leica R would sell for about $4,000.--. Too expenvise. Not to mention the lenses. A large part of the cost is in royalities for using the auto focus patents. They are aware of our desire for an AF reflex. At this point in time, it is not practical. The Kodachrome Blues... As someone who had a small part in convincing The Great Yellow Father (Kodak) to build a new Kodachrome Processor (K-Lab) and been on the edges of its construction, I think I can make a couple of useful comments about my favorite film, Kodachrome. The biggest drawbacks to Kodachrome are the processing turn around time and the very high quality of the E6 films available today. Most people do not want to wait several days for their pictures. In most big cities, you can get E6 done with a normal turn around time of four hours. In NYC make that two hours. People have lost confidence in Kodachrome, especially in the professional area. There are many horror stories of bad or poor Kodachrome processing. By the time Kodak solved the problems it was to late in the eyes of many. Lab owners are reluctant to invest in Kodachrome machines. Almost everyone who did went toes-up. The early machines were one million dollars each. The quality of the E6 films doesn't help either. They are getting better and better and they are approaching Kodachrome in the previously untouchable Kodachrome area, permanence. The new K-Lab solves all the problems of the past. It can work with low volume or high. It does NOT require a full time chemist. Dry to dry time is 45 minutes. There is an eight stop variability in processing. I can go on and on. Right now, it is a marketing problem for Kodak. Over dinner last week, a couple of Kodachome Kodakers and I talked about the problem. We concluded it would cost Kodak between 50 and 100 Million dollars to re-launch Kodachrome with no guarantee of success. This included R&D for a new family of Kodachrome films. The last Kodachrome alteration in Kodachrome was an improved K-200 to match the color balance of KPR-64 and tighten the grain structure around 1988. How would you like to make a 100 million dollar roll of the dice? That is exactly what Dan Carp, the new CEO has to decide. If you want to save Koachrome, I suggest going to their web site and show them, there is a real interest in Kodachrome. There are people in Rochester ready will and able to help. Regards, Sal DiMarco, Jr.