Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] F3 and 105 mm F2.5
From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 20:01:28 -0800

Mike Quinn wrote:
> 
> Mark Rabiner wrote:
><Snip> m f2.8 macro does not replace it it is too heavy to use as much. How
> > many dandelions can you shoot!
> > The 85 F2 would squash people on full length shots, I had to use the 105.
> > But now I use the 90 Elmarit on my Leica M with the Leica Winder and it's a
> > whole new ballgame.
> 
> But... Mark, what's this about the 85 f2 squashing people? I was going to
> buy one for my daughter. I thought the 105 might be a tad too big for her
> (and anyway I'm still reluctant to part with it). Is she likely to get
> squashed? Or just her friends? Please explain.

I half think your kidding Mike but I'm going to be a sucker and answer you
anyway!! :)
When doing full length shots of people they look shorter when you shoot them
with that 85 lens.
Pull back about 5 feet and shoot a full length of them and the look maybe taller.
That's kindof a big deal in fashion photography. A long line.
Mark Rabiner
anyway all these exquisite AI but not AF lens can be gotten for a song the
mindless multitudes are all clammering for AF.
Let them eat cake!!!!