Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Non-professional?
From: Greg Locke <locke@straylight.ca>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 12:05:59 -03-30

At 09:09 AM 26/02/00 +0000, you wrote:
>Bob,
>You're reading too much into this. After that intemperate, insulting,
>and reactionary post Jim wrote about art photography, I'm merely
>interested in what HE thinks is good. So far I haven't seen any evidence
>of his own pictures on the Leica-Users page, or any propositions as to
>what he considers to be preferable to Eggleston. I'm curious as to why
>anyone would hate all art photography, and curious as to what kind of
>photography he likes. That's all.
>
>--Mike

         Sorry, I'm coming late to this one... but I guess Winogrand is out 
of the question, too?


Greg Locke                         St. John's, Newfoundland
locke@straylight.ca              http://www.straylight.ca/locke
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Touched By Fire: doctors without borders in a third world crisis.
http://www.straylight.ca/touchedbyfire.htm
ISBN#0-7710-5305-3 McClelland & Stewart