Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] "notoriously crappy" lens
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2000 11:52:50 -0700
References: <27.936b645.26bd9149@aol.com>
 
Krechtz@aol.com wrote:
><Snip> Still, the consensus appears to be that the pejorative in
> question best applies to the Summar.
> 
> Joe Sobel

I had a collapsible Sumar by the way (On a IIIa) and it did not HAVE a
fingerprint it WAS a fingerprint.
You could NOT see the gold fish swimming around inside even if they were there.
Although the push-me-pull-you action was solid!
Mark Rabiner
In reply to: Message from Krechtz@aol.com (Re: [Leica] "notoriously crappy" lens)