Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Unused can mean New but Old Stock One time around 1981 while in Switzerland I happened to come across a tiny camera shop in a place called I think la Chaux de Font or something like that. Anyway, these guys had a brand spanking new SL2 for only 1200 dollars, which I passed up. Another time In New York around 1983 I actually found what must have been the last HP67 calculator new in a box. Naturally I snatched it up. Still have it!!! Unused can be great! Javier Matt Morgan wrote: > Martin, > Er....if your focus is on the difference in price, then it's because one is > a `L' model, and the other a `R'. > > ---------- > >From: Martin Howard <howard.390@osu.edu> > >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > >Subject: Re: [Leica] Fw: Leica FS > >Date: Sat, Sep 23, 2000, 5:16 pm > > > > > Martin Howard jotted down the following: > > > >> Sam Shoshan jotted down the following: > >> > >>> Bessa-L body Unused $229 > >>> Bessa-R body New $689 > >> > >> What's the difference between "New" and "Unused"? Aren't new products > >> unused, and unused products new, by definition? > > > > > > Oh, wait, I figured it out myself: it's six letters and $460! ;) > > > > M. > > > > -- > > Martin Howard | "Jesus loves you. Everyone else > > Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU | thinks you're an asshole, but > > email: howard.390@osu.edu | Jesus loves you." -- Bumper sticker > > www: http://mvhoward.i.am/ +--------------------------------------- > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com