Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: Is EBL a construct? Was: Re: [Leica] M6 TTL .58 accurate with a Noctilux?
From: Dennis Painter <dpainter@bigfoot.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 06:56:53 -0700
References: <v04011704b5fee1dd2cc2@[209.53.32.129]> <39D94FF1.69EAE9A1@umich.edu>
 
Dante A Stella wrote:
> 
<snip> 
> 
> So in sum, it would look like EBL is a questionable concept for magnifications
> over 100%, and that use of EBL for magnifications lower than 100% is really just
> a shorthand for accuracy in the hands of an average user, accuracy which may or
> may not be reflective of any particular individual.

Good grief!

Rangefinder accuracy has been studied a great deal with proper
analytical techniques. 

How about you do some research on other's studies before presenting a
summation. Maybe then it will be of more value to the LUG.

Dennis
In reply to: Message from "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] M6 TTL .58 accurate with a Noctilux?)
Message from Dante A Stella <dante@umich.edu> (Is EBL a construct? Was: Re: [Leica] M6 TTL .58 accurate with a Noctilux?)