Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/01/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Kodak TMZ
From: Jesse Hellman <hellman@home.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 00:11:49 -0500
References: <B67D505E.417%douglas@metaversalstudios.com>
While many on the LUG use Neopan 1600, I found years ago that it gave
much bigger grain than I got with Tri-X. Now I use TMZ at 1600 in Xtol
and the grain is less Why is Neopan preferred?
Jesse
Replies:
Reply from Guy Bennett <guybnt@idt.net> (Re: [Leica] Neopan)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Kodak TMZ)
Reply from MEBerube <MEB@goodphotos.com> (Re: [Leica] Neopan)
In reply to:
Message from Douglas Cooper <douglas@metaversalstudios.com> ([Leica] Re: Kodak TMZ)