Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jem Kime jotted down the following: > The surprising thing, I think, is the comparitive values placed on the SL > and SL2. Quite why the SL is so cheap I don't know, it does 95% of what the > SL2 does but sells for sometimes less than half the price. The prices of S/H Leica equipment have very little to nothing to do with their practical value as cameras. They are subject to the same fluctuations and changes in trends and fads as are stock markets. I'm sure that you could model this, using the same dynamics as have been used to model birds in flight. Wait five years and SLs and M5s might be the most expensive s/h Leica cameras to buy, while the current collecting frenzy of M3s in Asia may have resulted in a glut and they won't be able to give them away. Bottom line -- figure out what you need and get that. But the signal to noise ratio is poor. M. - -- Martin Howard | Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU | "Life imitates email." email: howard.390@osu.edu | -- Johnny Deadman www: http://mvhoward.i.am/ +---------------------------------------