Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Stolen Stuff
From: Phil Stiles <stiles@s-way.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 20:56:20 -0400
References: <ae.15e11b27.284951c5@aol.com>

Speaking of Stolen Stuff, why is it the custom to cite partial serial
numbers, ie. 456XXX ? Shouldn't the whole number be privided to allow a
search of stolen gear lists?
	Phil Stiles NH USA

SthRosner@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 6/1/01 4:07:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> red735i@earthlink.net writes:
> 
> << I have been purchasing used stuff for 35 years,,,, never once have I been
>  involved in anything that even remotely looks shady. >>
> 
> Frank: me too. One needs simply to be aware that there is some risk,
> especially with a seller you don't know. It may be minimal; a legitimate
> dealer has the serious burden of checking because he will protect his buyer,
> refund the purchase price and take the loss himself. It happens very rarely,
> but it can happen.
> 
> Seth
> LaK 9

In reply to: Message from SthRosner@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Stolen Stuff)