Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh.. bah!
From: "r g" <photos@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:24:05 -0400
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0107241629380.27666-100000@bokeh.pdi.com> <006e01c114b3$7cd63880$56234d18@gv.shawcable.net>
 
I use google.com as the "great leveller" in determining correlations.
Throughly circumstantial but renders the idea that bokeh is a semantic leica
construction a spurious argument.

Bokeh 3030 pages total.
Olympus 1060, Nikon 888, Canon 753, Leica 654, Pentax 512, Tamron 469,
Contax 435, Hasselblad 210, Mamiya    190

rg

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com>
> I never heard reference of the bokah thing until someone came up with it
on
> the LUG some years ago.
Replies: Reply from "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] RG's Google search)
 In reply to: Message from "Juan J. Buhler" <jbuhler@pdi.com> (Re: [Leica] Bokeh.. bah!)
Message from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Bokeh.. bah!)