Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]BTW - for one I'm sure - no one can tell the Leica difference in scans - monitor resolution is too low. Martin - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: sestdiena, 2001. gada 3. novembri 2:47 Subject: Re: [Leica] the 90% rule-long, rambling BS from Walt > > Ted wrote > > > > > I wondered if you meant >>> " crisper, sharper, contrasty etc etc" as > > all being positive adjectives in complimenting the image, as opposed to: > the > > "better photos"<<< which implies a better photo as in content. > Am I correct in this assumption?<<<<<<< > > George responded: > > Yes you are Ted, although I did not use any of those positive > > adjectives. > > The photos were equally strong and of very similar characters. See link > > http://www.georgeweir.com/pages/George-Weir-Personal_285.html > > n.b. these scans are from a fotovix so images are not as neat looking as > > prints.<<<<< > > It's a tough call and I rarely do this on a computer monitor, however here > goes and heaven help me if I'm wrong, as I'll never hear the end of this > one! ;-) > > Here goes... Leica? the second one ... kid in dark shirt and baseball cap? > the other is the Nikon? Why? There appears to be a sharper look to the > shirt and overall contrast effect compared to the first on with boy in white > shirt. > > Oh Lordy lordy let me be right! :-) > > ted > > Ted Grant Photography Limited > www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html