Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Non-Leica lenses for available light
From: Paul Chefurka <chefurka@home.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:53:53 -0500
References: <FE389C5B196ED511AB210090273CEFD058D02E@cca_exchng.ccapr.com> <FE389C5B196ED511AB210090273CEFD07B6D93@cca_exchng.ccapr.com> <FE389C5B196ED511AB210090273CEFD058D02E@cca_exchng.ccapr.com> <j2b8vt0oksf0h03gfbqjfebu2ogt2d34e0@4ax.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20011117102256.02a3f560@swiftnet.com>
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 10:32:41 -0800, David Rodgers <drodgers@swiftnet.com>
wrote:
>Why is it people always compare in terms of "this appears to equal Leica",
>and not the other way around?
:-) Some laws of nature can't be altered even with prayer: "Oh God, I hope this 35/1.4 AIS is as good as my Summilux ASPH."
Paul
http://www.chefurka.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@ccapr.com> (RE: [Leica] Non-Leica lenses for available light)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@ccapr.com> (RE: [Leica] Non-Leica lenses for available light)
Message from Paul Chefurka <chefurka@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Non-Leica lenses for available light)
Message from David Rodgers <drodgers@swiftnet.com> (Re: [Leica] Non-Leica lenses for available light)